![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEij8EFNBmCA_xEwWxg6t93Seve6i0aY9M4ZfaL0uTgxoHYNSCs-BtaZsfb9V9_qUP8KGVF5P5enZgJ_sKEH9drq0vJAyE3zgxXOjI0mjmkBDy4LXlLzWDVbGwOGrmWF2-e7z8zB1VDOxC4/s320/ravish+2.png)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2e3l-DJrooZbD-pXf-P60mKgche7eqo0sAUEHnaUrL5r2OdjMrA2YJr8Nu1BXdcY5eKlaYtv29Cjz83UefFP4mzofowALBEtUwzTiJwtzwXNfrL4-q1CdQuqXQ6HbpjN3M6FSMpCInNc/s320/ravish+3.png)
But in a bid to prove so, Ravish’s claims sunk, albeit inadvertently, into a labyrinth of falsehood, constructed over the years in collusion of the state and the media that communists in Punjab practised to fought against state terror and were “killed by Khalistanis”. Quite unlike Ravish’s style of journalism, this time, he glossed over the other side of the “reality” only to contradict himself.
Though Ravish was concerned about how 'Khalistani' narrative can be misused by Godi media and government, yet he went onto to report about the function that was organised on the occasion of Human Rights Day at Kundali border by the ultra-left body to seek the release of the some UAPA accused alleged for Naxal links. Here, Ravish didn't make an attempt to prove that those who were organising this function were not Naxalites.
First, check this clip.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJ9IuWaMp4thq6_o0hjdqN2ngLdAJdAI8mEXWdnOtdzzQBIGfPCDjCM7o1A4nrzwKppNLLbotk6wJsE_RYLydN8Wv0yg0Ns_K_WFqTGKeBP10GeVDREtW7Xxy_-VJdcpysTKLAMWQa-4w/s320/ravish+4.png)
Also, he couldn’t present the concerns of other farmer unions regarding this function.
If Indian constitution allows the peaceful demand of both Khalistan and Naxalite state then what is the reason that Ravish Kumar only felt threatened from one political ideology and preferred to ignore the activities of alleged sympathisers of other.
Whose point of view?
It was surprising that Ravish made a hero out of a farmer union without mentioning its political ideology. This is what The Indian Express published about Kirti Kisan Union and its head.
Nirbhay Singh Dudhike (70)
Kirti Kisan Union
Political link: CPI(ML) New Democracy
Dudhike came to the political forefront during an agitation against the killing of two students in police firing in Moga in 1972. He was associated with Tarimala Nagi Reddy’s Unity Centre of Communist Revolutionaries of India-Marxist Leninist (UCCRI-ML) and founded the Tillers Union. (As published in The Indian Express)
Beyond the visible
पत्रकार क्या करें । राष्ट्रवाद की जो आपकी समझ है उसके हिसाब से रिपोर्टिंग करें या घटना के हर पक्ष की बात रखे ।इस क्रम में वो ज्यादतियां भी करता है, बदमाशियां भी करता है, यह बात ध्यान में है, लेकिन राष्ट्रवाद की कौन सी बंदिश उस पर लागू हो… क्या हम और आप स्पष्ट हैं। सेना और सरकार का पक्ष अंतिम है, इसकी छूट मीडिया हर मामले में लेने लगे तो आप दर्शकों का क्या होगा… सोचा है कभी।
(क्या मीडिया में ऐसा राष्ट्रवाद दिखना चाहिए?, Kasaba, Ravish Kumar, July 20, 2016)
As Ravish Kumar rightly said that Army and government version cannot be taken for granted as far as Journalism is concerned. But can we make a version of 'communist body' for granted which is alleged for playing 'Salwa Judum' in Punjab?
His Prime Time was only based on the one-sided version of CPI(ML)'s current leadership. But it didn’t behove Ravish and his journalistic approach, not take a version of the side against whom he was alleging something.
According to his standards of journalism, Ravish would find it difficult to prove the charges he made against Khalistanis about killing of CPI(ML) leaders, whose pictures he telecasted in his prime time.
Have we seen Ravish Kumar raising his voice, scolding Naxalites for the killing of 'Salwa Jundam' activists on his Prime Time ever? Ravish's anger on alleged killings of CPI(ML) by Khalistanis was also discernible on his face.
During the era of armed Khalistan movement, CPI(ML) new democracy, then known as Naga Raddy group, was one of many communist groups in Punjab, which were provided arms by the Punjab police to fight Khalistanis. Punjabi poet Avtar Singh Pash was close to this group and wanted to take on Khalistanis directly with weapons provided by the government. It was nothing more than Punjabi Salwa Judum.
Leaders of CPI(ML) New Democracy, whose pictures were flashed by Ravish Kumar to invoke the emotions against Khalistanis, those were killed due to political struggle with Khalistanis. Ravish Kumar didn't show the pictures of Khalistanis killed due to alliance between CPI(ML) New Democracy and Punjab Police. Casualties were much higher on Khalistani side. Punjabi Salwa Judum used to celebrate killing of every Khalistani. It was political violence as we saw every day in West Bengal and Kerala.
(To read More about Punjabi Salwa Judum click here.)
It is a myth that communists in Punjab were in confrontation with Khalistanis for the sake of human rights. Human Rights have never been centric to left’s politics all over the world, and Punjab was no exception.
Government not only gave them weapons but also made documentaries on such communist 'human rights' activists.
Communists were in a political struggle with Khalistanis in Punjab. There was a rise of Naxalites movement in Punjab in the 60s. This movement was crushed by the state with an iron hand in the 70s. Before Khalistanis, fake encounters were used to kill Naxalite movement in Punjab. Communists were in shock with the disturbing transformation of the Naxalite movement into armed Sikh movement. Hence, they decided to take on armed Sikhs.
(Read More about this transformation here. How a Naxalite, who killed a witness against Bhagat Singh later killed the founder of Punjab Kesri group)
Another major reason was, of course, political ideology as Khalistanis and communists were on opposite ends about the idea of how the state should run.
Hence many communist factions agreed to took arms from the same state, which had killed Naxalite cadre in fake encounters just a few years back, to run propaganda against Khalistanis.
Congress and Liberal Godi Media
Politics of Congress in Punjab was nothing but an earlier version of Hindutva politics when a small minority Sikh community was vilified and subjected to genocide. There is enough documentation available on it only if one bothers to go through it.
The biggest problem is that major section of “liberal-secular” media at that time collaborated with “Secular” Congress government at that time ‘to show a small minority its place’. The idea of Khalistan actually picked up after 1984 army assault on Darbar Sahib and then genocide of Sikhs in November 1984. Sikh militancy post-1984 was a reaction to this genocide. However, with Congress’ narrative around nationalism, enabled by Left intellectuals, academics and journalists, worked more to hide the Communal agenda of Delhi.
Also, factually it is not true that no Khalistani is present at farm agitation. Even going by Election Commission of India, 49,000 people voted for the party that demanded votes on the name of Khalistan during 2017 assembly elections in Punjab. So it would be unrealistic to assume that none of these 49,000 voters came to attend farmer agitation.
So there are, in fact, some Khalistanis in this agitation but for sure they are not here to demand Khalistan. Not only Khalistanis but there are also Naxalites in this crowd who are again here to not create a naxal state.